This year, I'm hosting a read-along of all of the Little House on the Prairie Books by Laura Ingalls Wilder, which you'll find here. We'd love you to read along and share your thoughts, if you feel so inclined. I haven't included a sign-up sheet of any sort, but kept it all very informal. Here we're up to the month of May. And you can see by the state of my old book cover, that it was very well loved. There's not a single page still intact.
* * *
The Ingalls family leaves Plum Creek.
Pa heads west to the unsettled wilderness of the Dakota Territory. When Ma, Laura, Mary, Carrie, and Grace join him, they become the first settlers in the town of DeSmet. And Pa begins work on the first building in what will soon be a brand-new town on the shores of Silver Lake.
MY THOUGHTS:
The story picks up four or five years after the events of On the Banks of Plum Creek. New developments include the addition to the family of little Grace. But there's only been a couple of measly wheat crops since the grasshoppers decimated everything. And a bout of scarlet fever has swept through, making Mary blind. It's one of the saddest events of the series. As a kid I kept waiting for her sight to return, then realised it wasn't going to happen.
At the start, Pa's sister Docia arrives one evening and invites him to join her new family out west. She offers him the job of accountant and store keeper for a railroad camp. Best of all, the government is offering homesteads to settlers eager to travel, so he convinces Ma that it's their newest providential opportunity. The land is huge and wild, just the way Pa and Laura like it. So they're up and off again, and Ma and the girls get the chance to catch the train out there; an experience they find mildly terrifying.
I feel we get a bit of insight into why Laura was such a perceptive writer, with the skill to bring the most tiny, colourful nuances to life. It was surely because of her faithful promise to be eyes for Mary all those years ago. She was able to hone in on subtleties other authors might miss because she was used to it. Way back in her teens she'd trained herself to pay specific attention to detail until it became second nature, and put it to use again writing books. Wow, nothing is ever wasted. Pa meant it to be just for Mary, but Laura's talent blessed so many more. Mary said, 'You paint pictures when you talk, Laura.' She does when she writes too.
Those two sisters were always totally separate people who processed things differently, so there was bound to be communication misunderstandings. Mary was a realist who thought in terms of clear fact, while Laura had a more fanciful imagination and way of expressing herself. 'We should always say exactly what we mean,' says Mary. This frustrates Laura, who tries hard to put optical illusions and poetic insights into metaphors. To us, it all goes to show that there is more than one way of expressing truth.
Pa was a great dad who treated each of his four daughters differently, and I get the impression that Laura was closest to the son he didn't have. They shared the same restless streak, making them kindred spirits, always wanting to explore, keep moving, and just soak in the wonder of creation. It makes his bond with his daughter 'Half-Pint' or 'Flutterbudget' very special. Similarly, I sense that Ma and Mary were the ones on the same wavelenth. It happens in families.
What a contradiction Laura must have seemed to her mother and sisters, in what she chose to love and fear. She was bold when it came to nature and animals. She says she was so scared to ride the wild, bareback pony at the railroad camp that she 'just had to try it.' Yet a crowd of strangers was enough to suck away all her courage. (She did not feel alone and happy on the prairie now. She felt lonely and scared. The town's being there made all the difference.) To me, Laura has nailed the huge difference between being 'alone' and 'lonely.' It's the same solitude, but a person's preference and character makes it far more than just semantics. One is liberating and the other horrible. I can imagine how puzzled Ma and Mary must have been though. ('I declare Laura, sometimes I don't know what gets into you.')
The story drew me in just like the others, because it's like an invitation to visit simpler times. I love our internet era, but singing and dancing to Pa's fiddle sounds like an awesome substitute. And it's fun to imagine all the sewing, knitting and textile projects secreted away prior to Christmas. We're introduced to jolly Mr Boast and his young wife, who lends Ma and the girls a stack of serialised magazines, so now they can branch out from their one copy of Millbank. (See On the Banks of Plum Creek.)
Reverend Alden from Plum Creek shows up too, and offers the family another precious gift in the form of a new goal. He tells them about a college for the blind in Iowa, and everyone starts imagining how brilliant it would be for Mary to attend. It's obvious by now that the Ingalls' never have any spare cash, but one of their favourite sayings is, 'Where there's a will, there's a way.' If they manage to pull it off, it'll be another case of what Pa and Laura discuss the afternoon they watch the railroad being built. Before anything becomes real, it starts off as a desire in somebody's mind. He says, 'If enough people think of a thing and work at it, I guess it's pretty nearly bound to happen, wind and weather permitting.' So if anyone can make Mary's new dream come true, her family can collectively. But it'll be a long, hard road.
Of course it wouldn't be a Little House book without the occasional dash of danger, which the Ingalls family just manage to slip out of. Pa's payroll job almost makes him the victim of a potential riot. And there's the time Laura and Carrie skate straight up to the front door of a wolf den at night, like a fast food delivery. I love Pa's characteristic reaction when they arrive home puffing. 'It's too late to be scared now.'
I love her description of a town mushrooming up where there wasn't one before, transforming the whole character of the landscape and quality of the silence practically overnight. What a gem these books must be for the people who live in twenty-first century De Smet. What crazy times they were, when crowds of men turned up to take advantage of the land offer. And although it didn't wring a tear out of me when I was young, this time round I was crying about good old Jack's passing to the Happy Hunting Grounds, where Pa says all good dogs go. Their faithful old friend represents the steady passage of time, and it really touched my heart.
Now I'm looking forward to getting stuck into next month's continuation, The Long Winter.
πππππ
This series is so great, Paula! Even without having read the Prairie books, it's really great reading your reviews, they're so poetic! <3 Keep up the great work!
ReplyDeleteAww, thanks Sheree. So nice to think you're enjoying them ππ
ReplyDeleteWell, I just finished my review (which will post tomorrow b/c today is Memorial Day for the U.S.), and so I came by to finally read your post. (I like to postpone reading what you wrote so that I am not influenced in any way.) And yet, I am tickled to see how similar we are thinking -- what we chose to write about and the words we use to describe those events. For example, how different Laura and Mary are, how Mary is a realist, and that Laura developed her beautiful writing skills by being Mary's eyes. There are more ideas we shared, but that's a sample.
ReplyDeleteYou mentioned something that I did not, but definitely loved when Pa and Laura discuss how a thing must be an idea first. This is a great discovery for Laura.
One thing I get from On the Shores is that is begins very melancholy, but it is such a joyful, hopeful book, especially by the ending. But it is also helpful to know what is coming next, even if it is a long winter with many challenges. It only makes them stronger and more resourceful.
See you next month!
Hi Ruth, yes, it's great fun to compare notes at the end of each month. There is such interesting depth in the dynamics of those two sisters, and all four of them if it comes to that.
DeleteYou're right, the book begins with a melancholy feeling that plunges us straight to the land of grown-ups, but does lighten up the more the story progresses, and the deeper into the new land they go. I love that π Even though the land itself may be said to be getting darker, Pa and Laura's spirits are light.
I'll definitely be along to read your review when it's up.
A Little House binge on the Roku has led me back to these books. This one gave me some pause. I was shocked that Pa helped his sister and brother-in-law steal from the railroad commissary. His response so flippant, it's not his concern. I was shocked that a thirteen year old girl was married and her mom was just like, well she got a good man. What happened to her, I want to know. I love that Laura and her cousin say, well her life is over now. too accurate! I was a bit horrified that they all drank from the same cup at the train water fountain. I did not understand why Pa said there would never be a horse stolen from Silver Lake Camp. I read that chapter over and over and was still confused how he came to that conclusion and how that related to Big Jerry. I was also quite surprised that the Ingalls family made money off the supplies at the surveyor's house by charging for meals - those supplies were not theirs to profit from! It makes me wonder if Pa may have been a little shady at times.
ReplyDeleteYes, Pa was definitely a bit shonky on several occasions such as those you mention. I read and reviewed Prairie Fires by Caroline Fraser which gives more of an expose on him.
DeleteI totally agree that doing nothing to slow the spread of potentially lethal diseases is crazy, especially in an era of undeveloped medical intervention. That communal cup on the train raised no eyebrows at all. (I remember re-reading that in 2020 during the pandemic.) Horrifying really.
I'm off to re-read the remark of Pa's about the horse thieves. I'm sure I'll be as confused as you. π
Thanks for dropping by.