Monday, March 4, 2019

Characters who refuse to take responsibility



Okay, when you think of the stereotypical story, who is the hero's direct opposite? If you're like many including me, your reflexive answer may be, 'The villain.' It stands to reason that there's black and white, good and evil. That's why we have the likes of Voldemort, Emperor Palpatine, Captain Hook, Joker, the Wicked Witch of the West, and ultimately Satan, who is actually a character in Milton's Paradise Lost. 

But not all stories are written with such obvious play-offs between good and evil, or such desperate stakes. It seems when I think about it, that in other, more low key stories, the good protagonist has another direct opposite. He's not the bad guy, but simply the fellow who can't be bothered. In these stories, apathy is presented as the opposite to caring. The heroes are good-intentioned men who are pro-active in improving their worlds. But then there's the man who prefers to flee, shrink away, or hide his heads in the sand like the proverbial ostrich. He's most expert at shirking personal responsibility, and here is my count down of examples. 

Keep in mind, owing to the nature of these lists, there'll be a few plot spoilers.

482976Johnny Nolan
He's a good-natured singing waiter who loves his little drink, but taking care of his young family is something he just can't step up to do. His wife Katie is the family breadwinner. It dawns on her early on, with two helpless babies, that if they rely on Johnny they'll starve. Her cleaning jobs become their lifeline. (See my review of A Tree Grows in Brooklyn)

Fred Vincy
This young Victorian man has no idea what to turn his hand to. He'd prefer to keep sponging off his parents forever than choosing a profession. But some of his money-wasting, reckless pastimes cause heartache to the girl he loves. Fred's theme in Middlemarch is realising that he has to step up and just choose something. He's one of the rare success stories from my list. (See my review of Middlemarch)

54539Godfrey Cass
The squire's wishy-washy son once had an unfortunate fling with a poor village girl who died. When he discovers his anonymous baby daughter is destitute, he's not going to step forward and admit ownership. It'd ruin everything, especially his relationship with the elegant Nancy, who he hopes to marry. Staying silent while an old, eccentric weaver volunteers to bring up his daughter is by far the easiest action (or non). But circumstances make Godfrey regret it years down the track. (I love the line where his dad tells him, 'You hardly know your own mind well enough to make both your legs walk one way.') See my review of Silas Marner)

Stepan Oblonsky
Anna Karenina's smarmy brother has a plum government job and a disarming way of making everyone think he's a charming guy. He loves his affairs with multiple women, and always blocks out whatever he can't be bothered with, including his wife Dolly and their young children. But Stepan knows his good friend Levin is always around to pick up the slack and look out for their needs, which is just fine with him. (See my review of Anna Karenina)

Piers Aubrey
He's the unstable dad from Rebecca West's The Fountain Overflows. Piers keeps his family in a constant state of near starvation, because his entire focus is on the unpopular causes he chooses to support. He'll even take from the meager stores his family have, and gamble away furniture and other belongings. Eventually he walks out on them without warning. Luckily, his wife kept the value of a few heirlooms top secret, just because she knew him so well. (See my review of The Fountain Overflows)
31122
James Mortmain
His first book was a brilliant hit, but he's suffered from writer's block and self-pity ever since, while his children have grown up cold and hungry. The kids figure out that fending for themselves is a wiser action than waiting for their father to come through with a new book. Until one day, Cassandra and Thomas decide to take matters in their own hands and force him to get words down on pages. (See my review of I Capture the Castle)

Philip Curtius
The talented, but undeniably wimpy wax sculptor takes the very young Madame Tussaud (Marie Grosholtz) under his wing. But he doesn't have the gumption to stick up for her when she's treated harshly by his business partner, the widow Picot. (See my review of Little)

Captain Ahab
The crusty old peg-legged sea captain of the Pequod is so intent on his revenge mission to destroy the whale Moby Dick that he'll jeopardise the safety of his whole crew to achieve it. Irresponsible and stark crazy make a bad combination, especially when you're the boss of the whole voyage. (See my review of Moby Dick)

35031085Victor Frankenstein   
This young science student turns his back on his own creation, who is helpless and clueless at that stage. And the only reason is because of how he looks. As soon as he sees his project animated, Victor panics and flees, hoping it'll just disappear. His refusal to take responsibility helps make him and the monster equal hero/villains, which is why I consider this the most interesting example. (See my review of Frankenstein)

Running my eyes down the list, the most disturbing trend is that the majority of these guys are fathers or in a fatherhood role. That includes Frankenstein as creator. It wasn't my intention when I started, but surprises me in retrospect. The fact that I've drawn this list from a wide range of sources and time periods speaks volumes, considering the emasculation of dads that frequently occurs in our modern media. It seems the sorry stereotype of the clueless, useless moron who sits around while his wife pulls everything together has generations of fuel from which to draw. Perhaps we should take it as a sign that the world has always cried out for solid, dependable, sturdy and reliable family men who'll take a stand and be rocks instead of jellyfish. Let's keep looking out for real life heroes and applauding them when they come. 

10 comments:

  1. This is a very original and interesting post. Characters who do not take responsibility are unfortunately reflective of real life. I think that you have picked some great examples here. Both in real life and in literature I find such characters very frustrating.

    Thanks to this post I will be thinking about and looking for such characters in my reading:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Brian, they sure are frustrating. And they pop up in so many places. It can't be accidental that they're so prolific ☺ Another thing this list has in common with reality is that they probably don't easily change their stripes.

      Delete
  2. This is such an interesting list Paula. I noticed that most of them are in roles of a parent only when you pointed it out, making this even more astonishing. I find the character of Viktor Frankenstein to be the most telling. Clearly all these authors have done really well on commenting on irresponsible adult men but in such a subtle manner. Well done Paula on bringing this up! I will be on the lookout for more as I read ahead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Sne. It sure is an interesting, subtle link brought forth from all these authors. And their irresponsibility does have repercussions. If only Victor had behaved suitably toward his creation, how many lives would have been saved. Maybe I'll share a reverse list closer to Father's Day, with some excellent dads to balance this sorry lot 😊

      Delete
  3. You made me think of another one...Fyodor K. in Brothers Karamazov.

    If men...fathers specifically...understood the ramifications of their choices, it would be such a different world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ruth, Fyodor K is a great example 👍 And we see how his three (even four) sons were still bearing some personal impact of his poor parenting skills well into their twenties.

      Delete
  4. Very interesting post, Paula. I was thinking I was going to have to mount my usual defense of Fred Vincy, but you did close the Middlemarch part saying he was a success. I never say him as apathetic, though. Rosamond is more the villain in the novel—I find her loathsome.

    I agree with you about Victor Frankenstein—he’s infuriating. Careless, whining, self-absorbed, chauvenistic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Jane, yeah, I'm a fellow Fred fan 😉 He was one of my favourite characters, and as you suggest, worth ten of his sister 😂😂 What a self-focused piece of work she was. Poor Lydgate had so much patience with her.

      As for Victor Frankenstein, he's a bit of a male Rosamond in a way. It's a scary thought that a self-centred kid like him had the power to create life!

      Delete
  5. Oooh, Victor Frankenstein - spot on! The first one that came to mind for me was Augie March (possibly because I read it for the first time quite recently). He just kind of... let his life happen around him? Followed other people around? I struggle to recall a single instance where he demonstrated actual agency in his own life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Sheree, I've never read Augie March's adventures yet, but do like a good coming of age novel spreading across years. I'll look out for review of it.

      Delete