Monday, August 14, 2017

'Evelina' by Frances Burney



Frances Burney's first and most enduringly popular novel is a vivid, satirical, and seductive account of the pleasures and dangers of fashionable life in late eighteenth-century London. 

As she describes her heroine's entry into society, womanhood and, inevitably, love, Burney exposes the vulnerability of female innocence in an image-conscious and often cruel world where social snobbery and sexual aggression are played out in the public arenas of pleasure-gardens, theatre visits, and balls. But Evelina's innocence also makes her a shrewd commentator on the excesses and absurdities of manners and social ambitions--as well as attracting the attention of the eminently eligible Lord Orville. 

Evelina, comic and shrewd, is at once a guide to fashionable London, a satirical attack on the new consumerism, an investigation of women's position in the late eighteenth century, and a love story. 


MY THOUGHTS: 

I chose this novel as my Pre-1800 choice in the 2017 Back to the Classics challenge, since it was published way back in 1778. Frances Burney wrote Evelina anonymously at a time when novel writing (and reading) was frowned upon. I was thinking, 'I'll bet this was the sort of novel young girls were warned not to read.' I can guess how parents of that time might have found it time wasting. Burney's language has old fashioned charm, but her subject matter is pretty lightweight. Even when I'd got a few hundred pages into it, the storyline seemed to be nothing but socialising and trying to dodge the attention of annoying dudes. Several times I almost didn't finish. Not only was nothing much happening, but none of the characters grabbed my sympathy or liking. In fact, several of them were incredibly obnoxious.

Here's a quick summary. Evelina has been brought up by the elderly Reverend Arthur Villars, because her mother died giving birth and her father disowned her. She should have been an heiress of two fortunes, but instead, she's an unknown country rustic. However, family connections want Evelina to make her entrance into the world. Her French grandmother plans to win her fortune on her father's side by proving that the bounder was indeed married to her daughter. Evelina, who's been sheltered and innocent, has no idea about the predators and potential corrupting influences she'll find in the big city. The story is told in letters, mostly from her to her beloved guardian.

We're told part of her problem was 'too much beauty to escape notice, but too little wealth to be sought.' I've got to say, most of the men are depicted as complete shallow twits. They all fall head over heels in love with Evelina at first sight because she's pretty, without knowing or caring what sort of person she is. There are bullies, misogynists, philanderers, creeps and crashing bores. Fanny Burney sure knew how to create unflattering male characters, but I'm not sure that's a good recommendation for her book. These days, Evelina could get a restraining order against a pain in the neck like Sir Clement Willoughby.

One shining exception is Lord Orville, who Evelina thought could do no wrong. She had a huge crush on him from the very start, and called him, 'one who seems formed as a pattern for his fellow creatures.' Whoa, that's strong praise. Would you give your husband or boyfriend such a sweeping compliment? In Orville's case, perhaps it was true though, when you consider his competition.

37638
The eighteenth century would have been a tough time to be alive, because everything had to be a certain way. It was a real cookie cutter generation. You probably wouldn't hear any advice to 'be true to yourself.' They'd be more likely to say, 'Do what she's doing.' You were obliged to be feminine or masculine, according to your gender, and the rules were unbending. Both Evelina and Villars find Mrs Selwyn's tendency to use sarcasm and satire too forward and manly, whereas nowadays, we'd be more likely to accept that this is just her nature.

It seems you didn't have to step too far out of line to be considered low-bred or vulgar. Both Evelina and Orville were disgusted when three young men had a conversation about eating, including their extensive knowledge of sauces and dressings. To them, they came across as gluttons and epicures. To me, they might have been discussing a reality cooking show on TV, and I might've even joined in.

And then there's Evelina's newfound cousins, the Branghton siblings, who she cringed to be seen with. She was anxious to get rid of Sir Clement, yet still ashamed to have him see her with them. Okay, here's my confession. They didn't seem bad enough to warrant that sort of snobbery. If you've ever read this book, haven't you come across far worse people than the Branghtons? But Evelina knew the Regency social cues and I don't. If I managed to catch a time machine to that era, I'd probably be an outcast in a flash.

If you make it to the end, the story turns into a sudden soap opera with all sorts of stunning family revelations I thought were hilarious. For any other book I'd say, 'Come on, no way!' For this one though, my reaction was, 'Something's happening at last.' I'm not overly impressed with Fanny Burney's work based on Evelina, which is said to be her best. She might've been revived for a few reasons. The age of the book alone gives it a sort of hallowed charm, and she's also someone Jane Austen used to read. It's probably a sort of second hand fame, but I'd rather stick to Jane from now on. One thing I took from this book is that long, rambling small talk you can't escape from was just as tedious in the eighteenth century as it is in the twenty-first.

But to finish off with, here are some quotes. As there were so many pests, I'll grab a couple from them just to show what Evelina had to put up with.

Sir Clement Willoughby: I'm no advocate for hats. Where there is beauty, they only serve to shade it, and where there is none, they excite a most unavailing curiosity.

If you think that's bad, how about this one, from his friend?

Lord Merton: I don't know what the devil a woman lives for, after thirty. She is only in other folks' way.

Okay, let's mix it up with a few nicer ones.

Evelina: My intentions are never willfully blameable, yet I err perpetually. (There's one thing I have in common with her.)

Villars: A youthful mind is seldom totally free from ambition; to curb that is the first step to contentment, since to diminish expectation is to increase enjoyment. (That's probably the best line in the whole book, and it was over within the first few pages.)

I felt inclined to give it three stars just because it's the oldest book by a female author I've ever read, but no, I've got to stick true to my ranking criteria, and I really felt like giving up many, many times.

🌟🌟

8 comments:

  1. LOL Paula. Enjoyed reading your review but will probably steer clear of reading the book 😊😂😂

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Jenny, yes, consider yourself duly warned 😂

      Delete
  2. LOL! Loved your review, but I also loved the book - along with Fanny Burney's other books. It was a ripping good yarn and I've read it several times! I think the key to enjoying a book this old is the exercise of dropping all 21st century mindset as far as possible and enter the story as openly as possible. Sometimes it makes me laugh and I find myself wondering if the humor is intentional or if at least some of it is simply funny because it is so unusual. In any case, books like this one give as much insight into life in another age as a trip to one of the world's best museums. We have lots of artifacts, but very few original stories from another era that are as readable in their original form as this. I thought it was pure gold, and even though Jane Austen is more refined in a lot of ways, I can see why she liked it and I can see Fanny Burney's influence on her!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha, yeah, I can see what you mean re: coming into Burney with 21st century expectations and mindsets 😉 Perhaps I was too hasty in deciding never to give her another chance at all. I guess if we claim to love the era, books like this are late 18th century gold.

      Another type I haven't read yet is the whole Gothic, Mystery of Udolpho genre which JA was into. Lots to explore, and fascinating that it's all survived intact for 21st century readers like ourselves to have our say 😄

      Delete
  3. I have read MYSTERY OF UDOLPHO, but not being a fan of Gothic, it wasn't my favorite. I really only stuck it through to the end because I wanted to compare it to later, more mature Gothic works, such as the Bronte sisters. Personally, I thought UDOLPHO was primal and infantile compared to things in the same genre that came later. I thought JANE EYRE was a genuine work of art, as was WUTHERING HEIGHTS. WUTHERING HEIGHTS never appealed to me personally, but it was far more nuanced and gracefully written than UDOLPHO.

    I never read THE MYSTERY OF UDOLPHO again after the first time around. Not sorry I did at least once, though. If you ever write anything about that novel, I'd love to hear your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha, yep, I'll go in expecting just what you say :) I do enjoy the Bronte sisters' style of refined Gothic, and my most favourite author of the genre would have to be Wilkie Collins. The Victorian Gothic themes in The Woman in White and The Moonstone ticks all my boxes!

      Delete
  4. An interesting and witty review. I'm only commenting as 'anonymous', as the website won't let me comment any other way, my pen name's Lucinda Elliot.
    I like your comment that you could accept those wildly improbable co-incidences towards the end, because at least something was happening.
    This book was nearly as boring as Pamela or Clarissa. I read it a few years ago, and was less charitable about one of the original Mary-Sue's (the original being Pamela). Well, I suppose if Dr Johnson loved the heroine, she had to be inspiid. Everyone admires Evelina unless they are motivated by envy or malice, and the supposedly vulgar jealous relatifves never pull her appearance, motives, etc to pieces in a realistic way.
    As for Lord Orville, they're obviously perfectly suited, with him being one of the original Marty-Stu's.
    Clement Willoughby's name was obviously borrowed by Jane Austen for a dashing and untrustworthy suitor,and then, Mary quotes that sententious advice from Evelina's guardian about a woman's reputation being 'as brittle as it is beautiful.'
    Like you, I found the influence on Jane Austen the most intriguing thing about it, plus I did find it useful in providing mid-eighteenth century background material for my own writing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Lucinda, lovely to hear from you. Thanks for reinforcing my decision to never follow up with Clarissa or Pamela. I'm sure wallowing in this trite 18th century literature in the name of research can't have been an easy ride 😁

      I love your comment about Evelina and Orville being the original Mary-Sue and Marty-Stu. That's so true 😆 But I agree the influence these stories had on Austen's work is very interesting.

      Delete